Tachyphylaxis of the ECL-cell response to PACAP: receptor desensitization and/or depletion of secretory products.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Rat stomach ECL cells secrete histamine and pancreastatin in response to gastrin and pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating peptide-27 (PACAP). This study applies microdialysis to explore how ECL cells in situ respond to PACAP and gastrin. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Both peptides were administered by microinfusion into the gastric submucosa. The microdialysate was analysed for histamine and pancreastatin (ECL-cell markers) and for somatostatin (D-cell marker). KEY RESULTS: Microinfusion of PACAP (0.01-0.3 nmol microl(-1)) raised microdialysate histamine and pancreastatin dose-dependently. The response was powerful but short-lived. The response to gastrin was sustained at all doses tested. It is unlikely that the transient nature of the histamine response to PACAP reflects inadequate histamine synthesis, since the pancreastatin response to PACAP was short-lived too, and both gastrin and PACAP activated ECL-cell histidine decarboxylase. Unlike gastrin, PACAP mobilized somatostatin. Co-infusion of somatostatin abolished the histamine-mobilizing effect of PACAP. However, pretreatment with the somatostatin receptor type-2 antagonist (PRL-2903) did not prolong the histamine response to PACAP, suggesting that mobilization of somatostatin does not explain the transient nature of the response. Repeated administration of 0.1 nmol microl(-1) of PACAP (1 h infusions, 1 h intervals) failed to induce a second histamine response. Pretreatment with a low dose of PACAP (0.03 nmol microl(-1)) abolished the response to a subsequent near-maximal PACAP challenge (0.3 nmol microl(-1)). CONCLUSION: The transient nature of the histamine response to PACAP reflects desensitization of the PACAP receptor and/or exhaustion of a specific storage compartment that responds to PACAP but not to gastrin.

Submucosal microinfusion of endothelin and adrenaline mobilizes ECL-cell histamine in rat stomach, and causes mucosal damage: a microdialysis study.

Rat stomach ECL cells release histamine in response to gastrin. Submucosal microinfusion of endothelin or adrenaline, known to cause vasoconstriction and gastric lesions, mobilized striking amounts of histamine. While the histamine response to gastrin is sustainable for hours, that to endothelin and adrenaline was characteristically short-lasting (1-2 h). The aims of this study were to identify the cellular source of histamine mobilized by endothelin and adrenaline, and examine the differences between the histamine-mobilizing effects of gastrin, and of endothelin and adrenaline. Endothelin, adrenaline or gastrin were administered by submucosal microinfusion. Gastric histamine mobilization was monitored by microdialysis. Local pretreatment with the H1-receptor antagonist mepyramine and the H2-receptor antagonist ranitidine did not prevent endothelin- or adrenaline-induced mucosal damage. Submucosal microinfusion of histamine did not cause damage. Acid blockade by ranitidine or omeprazole prevented the damage, suggesting that acid back diffusion contributes. Gastrin raised histidine decarboxylase (HDC) activity close to the probe, without affecting the histamine concentration. Endothelin and adrenaline lowered histamine by 50-70%, without activating HDC. Histamine mobilization declined upon repeated administration. Endothelin reduced the number of histamine-immunoreactive ECL cells locally, and reduced the number of secretory vesicles. Thus, unlike gastrin, endothelin (and adrenaline) is capable of exhausting ECL-cell histamine. Microinfusion of alpha-fluoromethylhistidine (known to deplete ECL cells but not mast cells of histamine) reduced the histamine-mobilizing effect of endothelin by 80%, while 1-week pretreatment with omeprazole enhanced it, supporting the involvement of ECL cells. Somatostatin or the prostanoid misoprostol inhibited gastrin-, but not endothelin-stimulated histamine release, suggesting that endothelin and gastrin mobilize histamine via different mechanisms. While gastrin effectively mobilized histamine from ECL cells in primary culture, endothelin had no effect, and adrenaline, a modest effect. Hence, the striking effects of endothelin and adrenaline on ECL cells in situ are probably indirect, possibly a consequence of ischemia.

ECL-cell histamine mobilization in conscious rats: effects of locally applied regulatory peptides, candidate neurotransmitters and inflammatory mediators.

1. The ECL cells control gastric acid secretion by mobilizing histamine in response to circulating gastrin. In addition, the ECL cells are thought to operate under nervous control and to be influenced by local inflammatory processes. 2. The purpose of the present study was to monitor histamine mobilization from ECL cells in conscious rats in response to locally applied regulatory peptides, candidate neurotransmitters and inflammatory mediators. 3. Microdialysis probes were implanted in the submucosa of the acid-producing part of the rat stomach. Three days later, the agents to be tested were administered via the microdialysis probe and their effects on basal (48 h fast) and stimulated (intravenous infusion of gastrin-17, 3 nmol kg(-1) h(-1)) mobilization of ECL-cell histamine was monitored by continuous measurement of histamine in the perfusate (radioimmunoassay). 4. Locally administered gastrin-17 and sulfated cholecystokinin-8 mobilized histamine as did pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating peptide-27, vasoactive intestinal peptide, peptide YY, met-enkephalin, endothelin and noradrenaline, adrenaline and isoprenaline. 5. While gastrin, sulfated-cholecystokinin-8, met-enkephalin and isoprenaline induced a sustained elevation of the submucosal histamine concentration, endothelin, peptide YY, pituitary adenylate cyclase activating peptide, vasoactive intestinal peptide, noradrenaline and adrenaline induced a transient elevation. 6. Calcitonin gene-related peptide, galanin, somatostatin and the prostanoid misoprostol inhibited gastrin-stimulated histamine mobilization. 7. The gut hormones neurotensin and secretin and the neuropeptides gastrin-releasing peptide, neuropeptide Y and substance P failed to affect ECL-cell histamine mobilization, while motilin and neuromedin U-25 had weak stimulatory effects. Also acetylcholine, carbachol, serotonin and the amino acid neurotransmitters aspartate, gamma-aminobutyric acid, glutamate and glycine were inactive or weakly active as was bradykinin. 8. In summary, a range of circulating hormones, local hormones, catecholamines, neuropeptides and inflammatory mediators participate in controlling the activity of rat stomach ECL cells in situ.

Control of secretion from rat stomach ECL cells in situ and in primary culture.

The acid-producing part of the stomach is rich in peptide-hormone-producing endocrine/paracrine cells of different types. In birds and all mammals studied, ECL cells constitute the quantitatively predominant endocrine cell population in this location. They produce histamine and an as yet unidentified peptide hormone. The paracrine action of the ECL cells is to provide histamine to mediate the stimulating effect of gastrin on the acid-secreting parietal cells: the gastrin-ECL cell-parietal cell axis. Secretion of histamine from the ECL cells was studied in intact conscious rats subjected to gastric submucosal microdialysis and using isolated cells in primary culture. The microdialysis experiments revealed that ECL-cell histamine can be mobilized by the local infusion of gastrin, pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating peptide (PACAP), vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP), peptide YY (PYY), met-enkephalin, endothelin and noradrenaline/adrenaline. While gastrin and met-enkephalin induced a sustained elevation of the submucosal histamine concentration, endothelin, PYY, PACAP, VIP, and noradrenaline/adrenaline induced a transient elevation. Somatostatin, galanin and the prostanoid, misoprostol, inhibited gastrin-stimulated histamine mobilization. Studies of isolated ECL cells (80-90% purity) showed gastrin, PACAP and VIP to stimulate histamine secretion and somatostatin, galanin and misoprostol to inhibit gastrin-stimulated secretion. At present, it seems unlikely that metenkephalin, endothelin, adrenaline and PYY act directly on the ECL cells in situ since the effects could not be reproduced with isolated ECL cells. Clearly, the ECL cells operate under the multifactorial control of circulating hormones, local hormones, catecholamines, neuropeptides and inflammatory mediators.

Mobilization of rat stomach ECL-cell histamine in response to short- or long-term treatment with omeprazole and/or YF 476 studied by gastric submucosal microdialysis in conscious rats.

1. Mobilization of histamine from the ECL cells was monitored by gastric submucosal microdialysis in conscious rats. The ECL cells are known to operate under gastrin control and the purpose of the present study was to examine their in situ response to short-term (12 h) as well as long-term (28 days) hypergastrinaemia, induced by treatment with the proton pump inhibitor omeprazole. 2. Hypergastrinaemia promptly raised the histamine concentration in the microdialysate. The effect was prevented by CCK(2) receptor blockade (YF476). On day 7 of omeprazole treatment the microdialysate histamine concentration reached a peak, five times higher than before treatment. Subsequently (14 and 28 days), less histamine was mobilized. 3. Gastrin infusion (4 h) raised the microdialysate histamine concentration in a dose-dependent manner in fasted rats and freely fed rats and in rats treated with omeprazole for a week. However, while fasted and fed rats responded to low doses of gastrin, the omeprazole-treated rats required large doses of gastrin to respond. 4. When the amount of histamine mobilized was related to the serum gastrin concentration the following EC(50) values could be calculated: fasted rats 2.3 x 10(-10) M, freely fed rats 2.5 x 10(-10) M, omeprazole-treated rats 8.7 x 10(-10) M. The maximal histamine responses in the three groups were 18.4 pmol 4 h(-1)+/-0.8, 21.9 pmol 4 h(-1)+/-1.2 and 68.0 pmol 4 h(-1)+/-3.5, respectively. 5. The results suggest that ECL cells, exposed to a high gastrin concentration for a week, respond with a shift in the receptor-ligand binding affinity from high to low. Apparently, CCK(2) receptors of the ECL cells are subject to dynamic changes with respect to ligand-binding affinity.